Page 22 - NYLS Magazine • 2014 • Vol. 33, No. 1
P. 22





















By Steven Seidenberg

SyMPoSiUM MARkS



ThE 100Th AnnivERSARy 



of ThE inCoME TAx



















W

hen President Woodrow federal income tax has changed so much
Wilson signed the Revenue
over the last century, how the tax system 

Act of 1913 into law, the has run into problems, and how tax law is 
federal income tax was simple, eicient,
trying to address current issues, including Edward kleinbard presents the welcome 
and keynote address.
and paid by only those with high aggressive tax shelters.
incomes. It bears little resemblance to 
An undercurrent in the discussion was he opening speaker, Professor Edward 
today’s federal income tax.
how politically charged the tax law has Kleinbard, former Chief of Staf of 
he United States now has “ridiculously been from its inception. In her opening Congress’ Joint Committee on Taxation 

complicated tax laws” that collect taxes remarks, Ann F. homas, Otto L. Walter and now at the University of Southern 
in a “very unfair” manner, said Lee A. Distinguished Professor of Law at NYLS, California Gould School of Law, noted 

Sheppard, columnist and Contributing who organized the symposium, observed that “progressive and income tax have 
Editor for Tax Notes. he eminent
that the Revenue Act was the “irst always been joined at the hip in the 

tax journalist spoke at “he 100th federal income tax enacted following the United States.”
Anniversary of the Revenue Act of 1913: ratiication of the 16th Amendment..I 
“he reason for the progressive nature
Marking a Century of Income Tax Law never miss a chance to tell people it was 
in the United States,” a symposium co- actually ratiied..there are miscreants of the income tax is as an antidote to 
inequality,” Kleinbard said. But by that 
sponsored by the Graduate Tax Program out there who go around telling people 
at New York Law School and the New that that’s not true.that the 16th measure, the U.S. income tax system has 
failed dramatically, he said. “he U.S. has 
York Law School Law Review.
Amendment was not ratiied and that 
therefore every tax law from 1913 to the the most progressive tax system in the 
world.and we don’t change bupkus.. 
Twenty experts in tax law spoke at the present is unconstitutional. I do urge you 
October 4, 2013, event held a century never to miss an opportunity to set the Sweden and other countries have very 

and a day ater the enactment of the record straight.here’s a lot of wishful regressive systems but accomplish very 
Revenue Act. hey discussed why the
progressive results.” One reason why
thinking in tax law.”






20 New York Law schooL magaziNe • 2014 • VOL. 33, NO. 1


   20   21   22   23   24